Bots are crafting perfectly-polished resumes and different bots are screening them out. How do we harness AI’s efficiency and still make fair hiring decisions?
The modern job market is a battlefield where artificial intelligence fights artificial intelligence.
On one side are the job seekers. They’re using ChatGPT to craft the perfect résumé and apply to hundreds of jobs en masse. The appeal is understandable. There are more unemployed Americans than open jobs right now so the odds are stacked against candidates. In a market where candidates need to apply to 100+ jobs to net a single interview, AI offers an efficient way to play the numbers game.
Across the barricade are the recruiters. Application volumes are now too high for any human recruiter to manage, so companies are deploying AI to screen them at machine speed. AI tools can process resumes in 0.3 seconds and make an immediate call on what’s worth a human review.
The result is an unprecedented tech collision where algorithms are evaluating other algorithms’ work. This begs the question: is success more about having the smarter bot, rather than who fits the job?
Weapons of the Job Hunt
What began as simple résumé optimization has exploded into an arms race—candidates went nuclear with AI this year.
Job Sync’s Q1 2025 Candidate Pulse Survey shows that half of candidates admit to using AI in their job hunt, mostly to customize a résumé or cover letter to the opportunity. Automated mass-apply services like Apply Hero boast sending more than 1.67 million applications on behalf of job seekers. And LinkedIn is now processing 11,000 job applications per minute—up 45% from just a year ago, which is driven at least in part by AI-written résumés.
AI isn’t just helping with applications either. The candidate toolkit has expanded dramatically:
- Everyday tools like ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude draft custom résumés and cover letters, tailored to match the job description and packed with keywords. They also help with company research.
- Browser extensions such as Simplify Copilot make filling in applications easier by automating the input of personal info, education and work history.
- Platforms like LazyApply and Apply Hero submit dozens or hundreds of applications, quite literally while their user sleeps, sometimes leading to lower-quality matches, but high volume.
- Candidates now edit and polish one-way video interview responses with AI, or even splice together several takes before submission.
- AI-powered earpieces can be used for live interview coaching, helping candidates deliver eloquent answers in real time.
- Even deepfakes are on the rise. Deepfakes employ synthetic voices and avatars to pass video interviews, raising new security risks for IT and remote hiring teams.
Fraudulent and synthetic applications might seem extreme, but experts warn this could soon be the norm rather than the exception. Gartner predicts that 1 in 4 candidate profiles will be fake by 2028 and increasingly hard for recruiters to spot.
Recruiters Strike Back
It’s difficult to pinpoint the exact number, but estimates suggest nearly every large employer now deploys AI in some part of the hiring process (the World Economic Forum says it’s upwards of 88%). With application volumes surging, recruiters are fighting back with a widening arsenal of AI-powered tools and techniques to separate qualified, interested candidates from the AI-generated sludge:
- CAPTCHA tests for weeding out bot-generated applications.
- Planting nonsense ‘honeypot’ keywords in job ads to catch AI-generated submissions.
- Chatbots that answer candidate questions 24/7, improving their application experience and filtering out unserious applicants early.
- AI-powered resume screening at scale, often using tools that score and rank candidates for skills, experience and relevance.
- Content detection tools that flag bot-written, copy-pasted and recycled answers.
- Pattern recognition tools that spot career gaps and unusual job changes.
- AI-enabled skills assessments and job simulations that measure genuine ability, critical thinking and problem-solving in real time.
- Video interview platforms that analyze voice, response quality and facial cues during pre-recorded video interviews.
For recruiters, these tools mean faster screening and a cleaner shortlist. But every war has casualties. As employers increasingly rely on AI to find the best matches, many qualified candidates are finding themselves on the cutting room floor.
The Casualty of War is Trust
Two major casualties have emerged from the rise of automated hiring. The first is genuine talent who risk having their applications tossed out along with the bots.
With AI screening thousands of applications in seconds, even the smallest formatting error or missing keyword can mean instant rejection. Highly qualified people are eliminated simply because they used different terminology—a veteran, for example, with a military job title that doesn’t match civilian ones. Gone are the days when a sharp recruiter might spot promise in a non-traditional background or notice transferable skills, even if the keywords or chronology don’t match. The risk is especially acute for entry-level candidates, career changers, and those whose journey doesn’t fit the norm.
The second casualty is trust. Job seekers report feeling shut out by opaque algorithms that reject them with no feedback or explanation. Many no longer believe the process is fair or transparent, and even employers worry about whether the right people are being surfaced.
Algorithmic bias only deepens this skepticism. In 2025, a federal court allowed a nationwide age-discrimination lawsuit against Workday to proceed, on the basis that its algorithm could disproportionately reject older applicants. Employers are rightly worried—they could be liable for automated decisions they can’t always review or explain, raising the stakes for compliance teams. It’s a meaty topic that will keep lawyers and regulators busy for some time, and perhaps a blog post for another day.
Bias issues aside, today’s process is dehumanizing. Candidates want to connect with a human who can see their fit, which is just not possible with a one-way video screen. That’s assuming their application isn’t filtered out before anyone sees it.
In the rush to automate, there’s a risk of forgetting what really matters—hiring the right people in the right positions to drive business success. The challenge lies in harnessing AI’s efficiency while making sure that everyone gets a fair shot and people still feel seen as individuals.
Staying Ahead in the AI Arms Race
The use of AI in hiring isn’t going away: new AI tools are landing on the field every month. LinkedIn recently launched an AI agent that conducts preliminary chats with candidates and recommends top profiles to hiring teams. On the other side, candidate-focused platforms promise that job searching will soon be “as easy as watching Netflix.” We expect recruiters and candidates alike to use whatever tools they can to gain an edge.
But tools can never replace humans, and AI alone won’t win the war for top talent. The employers that stand out in this new era will optimize their people, processes and technology. That might be:
- Using skills-based hiring and robust, validated assessments to see what candidates can actually do.
- Leaning on behavioral interviewing that prompts candidates for real-life examples of handling challenges, making tough calls, or adapting under pressure. These stories honor more unusual candidate journeys and are tougher for AI to fake.
- Proactively sourcing and talent mapping to build high-intent candidate pipelines, rather than rely on what comes in through the front door.
- Humanizing the AI itself, by adding the brand’s voice and touch to automated messages.
- Staying transparent about when and how AI is being used to rebuild trust with both candidates and hiring teams.
- Running regular bias audits and keeping good records of both human and algorithmic decision making.
- Keeping real people involved for the most important calls, like evaluating capability and culture fit.
- Using AI as a guide for smarter, more responsive workforce planning, not as a substitute for informed human sense.
AI, with guardrails, can add great efficiency to hiring, but progress only happens if we carve out space for the parts that are unavoidably, wonderfully human. The future belongs to organizations that get the balance right.
About The Author
